Category: Society

  • Why Greeks evade tax and my car lies to me

    It is now 2012 and one piece of equipment regularly lies to me.   Your $300 smartphone will tell you where you are, it has a compass, a GPS and all sorts of fancy sensors.   Yet your $40,000 automobile lies in your face.   The speedometer never, ever shows your actual speed.

    Most people assume this is a design glitch.   Maybe it just can’t get the speed onto a round interface accurately.   But in this day and age of electronics, it doesn’t seem to make sense.   Surely, at least with electronic dashboard, the speed reading would be accurate?   Actually it isn’t.   Ever.   And it’s not a technical issue.

    By law, automobiles are allowed to lie up to 10%.   Depending on the country and local variations that is.   In most cases they are fined if the car ever shows less than what it is doing.  Which is my point.   Governments force the auto industry to err on the side of showing that you are going faster than you are so that the police can arrest you if you go to fast.   And you won’t have an excuse.   You can’t claim that your speedometer was showing less.  It is an artificially created cushion; a widely accepted movement of reality as understood by our technology.

    But since my GPS, or even simply timing my car on the motorway for a few miles shows me how wrong my speedometer is, why don’t they actually make an accurate one?   Theoretically, variations in tyre size could affect the accuracy speedometer.   Not much, unless you turn your sports car into a monster truck that is.   Couldn’t a car company actually make an accurate speedometer?   A couple of models (mainly hybrids) are pretty close already.   It isn’t a technical problem.    Cars are full of pixie dust.   Half the speedometer is dedicated to speeds you will never attain, often speeds the car can’t even reach.

    Maybe one day governments will finally do away with this parody.   Law enforcement agents don’t book you for going 51mph on a 50mph road anyway.   Even if your speedometer was inaccurate to a small degree it wouldn’t matter.   It is still analogue so you would be hard pressed to be that steady a driver to be able to drive with one eye on the dashboard at exactly the speed you want anyway.   The whole idea when driving is that you take care to be safe and fit in with the current conditions on the road.   Speeding tickets should be concerned with a mismatch between driving behavior and driving conditions anyway.

    So in this day of smartphones and accurate sensors, law enforcement agencies in both traffic and tax should adapt I think.   Depending on the country and the state of technology, this gap between what government says it is doing and what it clamps down on costs honest people time and money.   Transparency please.

     

  • On Germans and Other Greeks

    “There was a time when Richard Wagner wrote no music for almost six years. He was thirty-six, and had completed three of his ten major operas. The Flying Dutchman and Tannhiiuser had been launched, with varying degrees of success, in Dresden, but Lohengrin had not yet found its way to any stage. There was a price on Wagner’s head. He had been involved in the 1849 Dresden uprising – providing places for secret meetings, supplying grenades, reporting on troop movements from the tower of the Kreuzkirche, watching the opera house where he was employed go up in smoke. When the uprising failed, he was charged with treason and forced to flee from Germany. Some of his associates were caught and sentenced to death, though the sentences were eventually commuted to long prison terms. Wagner, with forged papers and an assumed name, took up temporary residence in Switzerland. There, beset as he was by political, personal, and financial difficulties, he found he had come to an artistic impasse.

    He could write no music. Instead, as the four operas of his Ring cycle gradually took shape in his head, he turned out volume upon volume of rabid, fevered, tortured prose. Much of it was political, and all of it touched on the nature of art. Partly to convince others but largely to convince himself, he fashioned an artistic creed so comprehensive and demanding that, when he turned to write music again, that music – the opening pages of the Ring – was like nothing he or anyone else had written before.”

    In “Athena Sings: Wagner and the Greeks“,  M.Owen Lee traces the influence of ancient Greek tragedy on the great musician.  As nationalistic fanaticism rages today around the Euro 2012 football match I though we should remind ourselves that these two countries have pretty deep ties.

    “By the time Nietzsche begins writing The Birth of Tragedy (it would be published in 1872), the question of tragedy had already been firmly established in Germany. In less than a century from the appearance of Schelling’s reference to Greek tragedy as the site of a solution to the enigmas of post-Kantian philosophizing, the topic of tragedy had taken root in German thought so deeply, so fundamentally, that the history of its presence in nineteenth-century German thought was almost as important as the original history of Greek tragedy that belongs to fifth century b.c.e. Athens (curiously, when Nietzsche first confronts it, the first life of this question—as it is found in ancient Athens and played out in the theater—is only as long as the second life of the question—-which is found in Germany—and is played out in academic publications). By the time Nietzsche broaches the question of tragedy and its relation to the modern world, the history of the second life of this question is, by and large, for better or worse, owned by Hegel. When the young Nietzsche begins to take a serious interest in Greek art, especially Greek tragedy, Hegel’s argument (or, better, the Hegelian argument as it was canonized by his epigones) that the structure of tragedy was ultimately a dialectical structure had become something of a commonplace.”   (On Germans and Other Greeks – Dennis J. Schmidt)

    But is is not just about ancient Greeks and romantic German intellectuals.

    “An important aspect of Greek identity involves the extent to which it can be considered an Eastern or a Western country. Today, when Greeks prepare to go abroad to Germany, England, or France, many say, “We are going to Europe.” This may seem odd, given that Greece is a full member of the European Union, and most people think of Greece as the cradle of Western civilization. It is ironic that while the West looks to Greece for the source of its own identity, for most of its history the sights of Greece have been turned toward the East. In ancient times, Alexander the Great turned his back on what he considered a barbarian West and spread Hellenism to the East as far as India. When Constantine established his religious headquarters, it was the growing town of Byzantium that he chose, not the small village of Athens, with its few houses spread beneath a forgotten Acropolis.   The Orthodox Church, which was the primary force behind Greek identity for nearly 1,500 years, has always maintained a strongly anti-Western stance.”

    Exploring the Greek Mosaic: A Guide to Intercultural Communication in Greece – Benjamin J. Broome

    As Greeks prepare for the match and even decide not to buy German beer today they forget just how much Germany has helped many Greeks that went there as guest workers.   Trying to rally up memories of the second world war and the atrocities is out of place.   Here are a few British reports:

    “122. The German occupation, whilst rigorous, has exasperated the Greeks less. The change when passing into the German from the Italian zone is very noticeable. The Germans forfeited their considerable popularity by their callous behavior during the famine and their wanton looting of public and private property. The removal of art treasures to Berlin and the flagrant commandeering of luxury goods and furniture, which could have no military justification, disillusioned the Greeks. Lastly, they showed that they were the Herrenvolk in many infuriating ways, by knocking Greeks off trams, by hitting them in the streets.

    123. But latterly the Germans have only behaved harshly when they had some pretext. German troops have been instructed to behave properly to the civilian population and they seem to have fraternised with the Greeks. It is possible for 20 Germans to visit a village in circumstances in which the Italians would only go 1,000 strong.”

    British Reports on Greece 1943-1944 -John Melior Stevens, Christopher Montague Woodhouse, David John Wallace, Lars Bærentzen

    So call me a traitor if you want.  I will be cheering for the Greek team tonight but fully expect the Germans to trounce us as they are systematically better at football of course.   And for all my German friends, all those great people I have met around the world who happen to come from that part of the world, there are many of us over here who love you, Merkel and all.   Maybe we should all be reading more from our great thinkers …

  • The Greek crisis produces media stars of disinformation

    For more than two years now international attention has been on and off.  George Papandreou milked it as much as he could.   Having the potential to blow up Europe or even the world economy according to others is a feat unmatched even by Bin Laden.   Unfortunately nothing constructive has been done with this spotlight.

    Yannis Varoufakis is a prime example.   Our rather dim witted prime minister had legions of advisers.   Varoufakis was one of them and realised the potential better than others.   The world economic crisis has changed the role of economists in general.   A lot of interesting debate has come of it.   Some rise to the challenge and put old theories into new shoes from a communications point of view.   And some, like Mr Varoufakis, decide it is easier to simply become militant.   The joy of economics is that you can always construct a counter argument which seems convincing.

    Try reading his “message to the BBC and other assorted international media“.   Chomsky can crossover from linguistics to economics and to media analysis and still be a reference point.   Varoufakis can’t.   Using vocabulary pretty similar to the SYRIZA party he supports.   We learn about the “Assault on Truth” and that international media are “violating every journalistic standard and principle known to man or woman”… (is that even logically possible?) …you get the point.

    Even better, he writes a whole blog post about how the BBC cut him off  before he was  ” given a chance to complete my point”.   The rather interesting video shows him on a uniquely boring monologue of more than two minutes during which he is only briefly interrupted with a question.  Not even heads of State, or major international personalities with few media appearances get such an easy time on the BBC.   He is right, there is bias.   I suspect the journalist doing the interview just didn’t know how to cut him off politely!   It was a hot day and he probably just thought “ah, let him rant and I will take another sip on my frape instead…”

    If the BBC faked a technical glitch to cut him off well, that’s a pretty good call from the viewers’ point of  view.   Anyone with experience in such interviews knows damn well that you are usually lucky to even get a soundbite through intact.   Varoufakis complains about them not letting him develop his argument as if he is structuring a lecture.  (Though the rest of his interview doesn’t bode well for his lecturing capabilities.)  And all this strong wording and rather unfair criticism from a man who the BBC has on various shows quite often!   (Listen for example to a more usual interview here – after 16′ 55″ where he speaks much less and the journalist interrupts him much more.)

    So why does this obviously clever man do all this?   Why does he bark “wolf!” regarding an – always – imminent Euro collapse even though he has been barking up the wrong tree for some time now?   Obviously it works!   According to another report by the same, highly biased, BBC, he got offered a job through the attention.   It doesn’t really matter if the Eurozone doesn’t crash.   People like Varoufakis will simply reinterpret the data into some other conspiracy theory.   Much like the US was going to “collapse” back in the 70s with the oil crisis.   He brags on his blog of  his “duel with the bank exec” as if it is a game on the one hand and/or that he is the only saviour of the Truth and all the planet’s underdogs on the other.

    Betting on the future has been big business for fortune tellers for thousands of years.   Shame that some people choose to ridicule their countries when they do it publically and internationally like Mr Varoufakis.

  • Kakapo: Greek journalism goes to the dogs over a non existent fascist threat

    The kakapo is a bird that forgot how to fly.  It landed on an island with no predators.   Over many years its meals got bigger, its flights shorter.   Wings weaker.   Now when a cat chases a kakapo, the flightless  bird will climb up a tree and jump down to its death.  It still thinks it can fly

    It is inevitable to an extent.   Old media is crumbling.   A lot of journalists for many years lived rather comfortably with little stress, excellent wages and a lot of freedom.   The media was sponsored by business people who used it to pressure the governement as and when necessary.    Like the Kakapo, they have simply forgotten what journalism is all about.

    Their current frenzy is over the so called “right wing extremists” of “Golden Dawn”, a party which got more than 6% of the vote in the recent elections, thus becoming entitled to 21 MPs in the Greek Parliament.  It is common in many European countries to worry about right wing extremism.   It is indeed in many cases a serious threat to civil liberties and even a terrorist problem.   Not so in Greece.

    There are two ways to try and approach this issue.   If you do it with objective analysis, you will come to the conclusion that journalists are over reacting and that there is no real evidence.   “Alleged” and “seems to show” are the kind of words you would expect to find in this sort of “journalism”.   More like low quality blogging I would say.   Here’s a great example, an article in the usually quite serious “Kathimerini” by Xenia Kounalaki.    She suggests that “Golden Dawn” is “shut out of the public sphere”.   Doesn’t sound very democratic does it?   She writes about the “criminal activity of its members” but doesn’t cite any examples.   This kakapo is as flightless as they come…  “Ι am all for censorship and very strict isolation of this group; when fascists speak, I don’t want to listen” notes a popular editor in chief.

    The second way to approach the matter is straightforward conspiracy theory.   Right after the people that are sure we are being sprayed with secret chemicals to make us submissive.   Or they confuse the issue with a theory that Greek police are somehow secretly linked to this organisation.   Vague videos on YouTube, blurry pictures and close ups that supposedly “prove” it.   Wait a minute!   Aren’t journalists the people that are meant to find evidence and proof?  If the police is somehow secretely involved, can’t journalists produce some definitive evidence?

    Worse still they recycle ridiculous half baked “proof” which would make any real journalist cringe.   For example today the “evidence” that at specific polling stations in the recent elections where police officers voted “Golden Dawn” had higher success.    If this was true it would be a terrible encroachment on the right to a free vote!   How would journalists like us to know what they voted?

    Extremism, and even more so right wing extremism has always been used in Greece as a bogey man.   Much like Mr Laliotis, allegedly the most corrupt Public Works minister in the entire EuroZone, when pressed on some question would always revert to his glorious past in helping overthrow the military regime in 1974…   “The people don’t forget what The Right means” is still chanted in protests implying rather vaguely to some time in the past when the military or the police cracked down violently.   Could be the civil war they are reffering to; they don’t really care.  It works!

    If some members of “Golden Dawn” are involved in gang type violence in the centre of Athens they should be arrested.   It has absolutely nothing to do with ideology or fascism.   If the police is covering for them, the police should be improved.   But anything more is right out there with alien abductions and secret sects ruling the world.  Yes, they have tried to associate “Golden Dawn” with them too!   If they bothered to look around Europe they would see that other countries have had far right groups in their Parliaments for many years.   LePen’s type of “civilized face” to the movement is a much greater threat than black shirt wearing thugs.

    The whole discussion is a horrible reminder of just how hypocritical certain self professed libertarians really are.   They say “fascists should be killed!” or “they shouldn’t be allowed to speak in public!”   Rather selective sense of democracy it seems to me…

    P.S. Just because I know some people jump to conclusions I  need to make clear that I do not condone racist violence and illegal acts in any way.   But you really need to differentiate between acts (punishable by law and so they should be) and free speech.  “Sticks and stones may break my bones but words can never hurt me”, eh?

     

     

  • Surprise developments in the 2012 Greek elections

    I love political communication.   It appeals to the idealist in me.   The social engineering part of me thrives on twisting messages to fit into mediums that will best influence people.   And right now, Greece is the place to be.   The old media is crumbling.  Based on funding from business people that used television and newspapers to influence public spending (ie get the tenders for big projects through blackmail!) the whole model crashed.   Social media rides in and …everyone is confused!   An ex US ambassador to Greece does a great summary of what led us here on his Facebook page.  (In English, the original is here.)

    So in order to get involved with a political party, first I had to pick one that is actually not corrupt.   Athena Drakou explains it all (in English) here from that perspective in this excellent introductory article of hers.   And then, a few weeks before the elections, we have to take a party that 99% of Greece hadn’t even heard about a month ago and get it into Parliament.   With zero budget!

    As we look at highly dubious poll results and await the exit polls, there is a major upturn in Greek politics.   A. Apostolakis – eshop.gr founder and entrepreneur does it here .  A.Doxiadis – famous author and mathematician does it here . G.Tziralis – the Greek start up man does it here. N.Moraitakis does it here. 53 other Greeks from abroad do it here.  What we have is a pandemic of famous and important Greeks who have never before stated their political affiliations publically doing it now.   Why?

    Sure it is an amazing bunch of people.  Within the party and around it, most major Greek intellectuals have gone public in support of “Drasi or Stefanos Manos personally.   It was part of our strategy (for lack of budget) but it has spiralled almost like a viral social media campaign.   Sure the party is on very solid ground through wise long term planning.   It is a loosely knit group of very clever people, each somehow pulling in the same direction without the need for a big central structure.

    In the last week before elections we have witnessed a unique development as one after another, major public figures from business and culture take a stance in support of “Drasi”, either through online articles (mainly online, as the party is shut out of most media).  Even vocal supporters from “the Left” and a communist party figurehead have decided that something important needs to change in Greece.  Until now everyone kept there political affiliations a secret for fear of losing a job, a deal or a position in the civil service.   Now they are publically supporting this party for fear of there being no jobs left to get!

    But ultimately, especially for a region like Greece which resembles a volcano ready to erupt, good communications will be the deciding factor.   Especially if (when) the May elections do not produce a useful government, there will be 11 million even more disappointed Greeks to kick into action.

    (Full disclosure: I am in charge of the social media campaigning of “Drassi”.  For more information visit www.drassi.gr or – in English the links provided above.  For the latest guesstimates on possible outcomes you will be really hard pressed to find any authoritative account – I have put a summary  of polls here.)

     

  • Germanic revenge: Greece and it’s Allies get what we deserve

    Even if you haven’t read Churchill’s account, there is no way in avoiding the conclusion that it was the way the Allies handled victory in the first world war that pushed Germany into the second one.   We took their pride, divided their land and burdened them financially to an inconceivable level.   Hitler’s words appealled to desperate, bitter and hardened people with nothing to lose, not die hard born fascists.

    So many years after the second world war Greeks are now complaining about money they feel is owed to them from theft and massacres during German occupation of Greece.   There is an important difference:   Germany worked it’s way out of the dismal situation we put it in.   Some Greeks, once again, lazily await a miracle.   They feel they are “owed” a magical solution to the current financial mess we got ourselves into.

    Selectivity in reading history is always a problem.   Maybe we need to learn more about the German miracle.   Precisely how Germany got from utterly destitute to the triple A powerhouse it is today in Europe.   Even if some people wish to treat them as enemies instead of the allies they now are.

    We would do well to learn more from them.   (One example I have refered to in the past is the mid sized German family business that we would do well to emulate.)

  • How to make a film like Theo Angelopoulos

    Ingredients:

    1. A CD with music by Eleni Karaindrou.

    2. A photo album, the kind you find in the lounge usually with scenery or black and white pictures.

     

    Instructions:

    1. Play the music.

    2. Flick through the photos.   Really slowly.  1-5 minutes on each usually is OK.

    3. You can (slowly!) move your gaze across the page occasionally.

    4. Think or don’t think of anything you like.

     

    The overall effect is remarkably similar to a Theodoros Angelopoulos film in my opinion.

    In a country stuggling to get a film industry working, Angelopoulos was a symbol of success though he didn’t actually much help improve anything.    Some loved him, other considered him Rotten Tomato material.

    In a country battling with anarchy the question why an old man (albeit a famous old man) was allowed to walk across a busy street and what sort of safety protocol his production company was following begs an answer.

    Personaly I won’t miss him at all.   Other than a striking resemblance to my dear uncle who shares his first name I found little of interest in his film and much to critique in his actions.   Greece has bigger problems than whether or not his films were boring.   If there is a budding new Theo Angelopoulos in the wings let’s hope he has a better idea how best to help his country abroad than the one that just passed.

     

  • Goebbels needed in Brussels to change the flag

    “The European flag consists of 12 golden stars in a circle on a blue background. The stars symbolise the ideals of unity, solidarity and harmony among the peoples of Europe.

    The number of stars has nothing to do with the number of member countries, though the circle is a symbol of unity.”

    That is all you get when trying to discover what the flag is about from the official site.    Contrast it to your nation of choice’s story.   You probably have several versions of your country’s flag as it developed, rich in history and people, wonderful colorful fairytales connected to your past.   You probably know this information by heart because you learnt it at school.   You probably have some emotional response to your flag.

    To anyone in communications or branding, what the European Union is doing is suicidal.   While there is much talk about “nation branding” and what individual countries do to themselves or to each other regarding negative press, nobody seems to care about the Union itself.   This goes against millenia of wisdom concerning economic and cultural development.   According to a summary:

    “Images of the EU are split:
    positive images:

    the EU as “strategic opportunity” for the partner countries; a trade giant; a
    supporter of multilateralism (or at least multipolarism); a model of regional integration; and
    a possible counterbalance to US hegemony, a protector of the environment;
    negative images:

    an actor whose policy is severely influenced by its own security or
    economic concerns; a neo-liberal actor in its external relations; and a protectionist power
    (CAP).  EU’s self-representation as a solidaristic actor is called into question. Moreover:
     Little evidence of the EU being widely seen as a “normative power” exporting
    universal values of democracy and human rights.
     No evidence of the EU being widely regarded as a social model to be imitated.
     No public reward for EU’s development cooperation policy”

    The current global economic crisis is focusing on the European Union for good reason; it is easy!   Any single sovereign country can deal with an external attack.   But in Brussels they decide by…committee.   In the worse sense of the phrase.   According to Nicholas Moussis in “Access to European Union law, economics, policies” “…the edifice of the European Union is divided horizontally in floors. The floor of the common market was built on the basement of the customs union. Apart from the four fundamental freedoms (free movement of goods, persons, services and capital), the common market floor consists of numerous horizontal and vertical compartments, which contain the common policies…”

    At least this author is trying to make it understandable.   Because moving from separate countries to any other system is something which citizens of Europe have not quite perceived yet.   The task is made harder by politicians in every country using the EU as a scapegoat for their political problems.   They used to point to some neighbor or other threat when they needed to rally up support; now they just point to Brussels.

    From a communicational point of view it is amazing.   We would assume that when you give a handout, you will demand some sort of media attention.   If I am bailing out French farmers, the least they can do is put up an EU flag.   Even better they should commit to some cultural change towards European integration.   Somehow the EU managed to squander its capital (economic and in terms of good will) without getting anything in return.   A feat only possible by a committee!   In any other human-to-human interaction there would have been more.   If the United States were set up as a “melting pot of cultures”, the European Union is set up as a feudal parody.   Immigrants entering the US learn about its constitution.   In Europe we can’t even manage that.

    The film industry is a great example.   A variety of Euroinitiatives concerning film making, film distribution and other cultural aspects of film and the results?   Absolutely nothing.   On average, European don’t watch more locally produced content, nor is European film thriving abroad.   We are neither helping Europeans become more aware of their cultural heritage nor telling the rest of the world anything about us.   And of course we are nowhere near making it a viable business in any of the country – members.   For the size of the internal media consumption market and the depth of talent in this field it is a simply amazing feat of incompetence.

    So now we need a Goebbels.   I don’t care who runs the ECB, I want to know who is in charge of propaganda.

  • The planet is lucky Steve Jobs stuck to making gadgets

    I think everyone in branding envies Steve Jobs.   Some turn it into adulation, others into hate.  He was the ultimate spin doctor.  From “we burn Pentiums to the ground” to “we love Intel” in the space of a few months.  Or “we will never use Adobe Flash” to “OK, we will implement it in everything again”; most politicians would do well to study how he did it.

    From the Apple IIe back in the early 80s, to my Macintosh and then the Quadra at University, I must admit I never agreed with the company’s approach to doing business.   Because there was only one beneficiary:   Steve Jobs!  The concept of a sales channel simply didn’t exist in his mind.   Up or down his supply chain everyone was milked for everything they had.  5,6 or 8 billion dollars or whatever his net worth was as he died and not a cent given to charity.

    And yet the whole planet mourns.   If this man was in charge of a country, he would have set his neighboring country off doing space exploration (he would keep the rights and take the credit though), we would all be earning $100 a month and he would be re-elected every time.   We would all believe we are living in a golden age of a perfect life as we waited for the next version of his social policies to actually work.   He would be president of the United Nations and kick everyone else out of the meetings.  We would put up with his laws being practically a dictatorship; and like it too!

    We should all breathe a huge sigh of relief at the passing of this genius.   Because it wasn’t evil genius.   Simply a megalomaniac without a real vision.   Selling gadgets for people to play “Angry Birds” on, isn’t a vision.   Fighting poverty in Africa, famine or cancer is a vision.   Getting rich people to buy shiny hardware doesn’t change the world.

    Read here about “The Other Steve Jobs: Censorship, Control and Labor Rights”